BTerrell Group Blog

A Study in Unintended Consequences - ACA Results in Shorter Employee Workweeks

Posted by Brian Terrell on Mon, May 18, 2015

The construction industry seems to be booming in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, so I was surprised to recently hear of a young man in Dallas having trouble finding a job working 40 hours per week in that industry. As I considered the situation, I realized that many companies may be lowering the number of hours available to employees, and this could be an unintended consequence of Affordable Care Act (ACA) requirements taking effect in January 2015.


The ACA requires employers to provide coverage or pay a penalty based on the number of employees working 30 or more hours per week. The Employer Shared Responsibility provision of this statute defines a full-time employee as an individual employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week, and this provision applies only to employers with 100 full-time employees starting in 2015 (50 full-time employees starting in 2016).

As a result, many companies across various industries are changing scheduling activities. According to Fox Business, Mercer, a human resources consulting company, conducted a survey that concluded that 12% of all U.S. employers reported plans to reduce workers’ hours as a direct result of the ACA. Fox Business also reported that in a survey conducted by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), 41% of 603 small business owners said they have delayed hiring because of the federal healthcare law. One in five had already cut hours when the survey results were published. A report from the UC Berkeley Labor Center shows which workers are most at risk of reduced work hours under the ACA. suggests seven steps to prepare for ACA regulations including tracking employee work hours and determining who you must cover, but I suggest leaving the details to the experts to help avoid penalties. Luckily for Intacct users, AmeriFlex Workforce (integrated with Intacct through WorkforceGo!) helps make ACA compliance monitoring easy by simplifying processes around ACA compliance, providing accurate visibility into average hours worked by full-time and part-time employees (including the look-back and stability periods), and automating benefits eligibility notification and open enrollment.

Contact us for more information about AmeriFlex Workforce and how it can help simplify ACA compliance for your company.

Tags: Affordable Care Act, ACA, AmeriFlex, Workforce Go!, ACA compliance,

Impact of Health Insurance Law on Business: What We Can Do

Posted by Brian Terrell on Wed, Feb 26, 2014

Often, I remind myself that the contention in Congress reflects the diverse opinions of those Congress represents.  That’s me and you.  When it is all said and done, we are responsible for their failure to compromise and lead the country forward.  We are the ones who put them there, and we are the ones that can make the change.  Should I complain or just work to affect change?


Nowhere is this public opinion divide more obvious than in the debate over the Affordable Care Act (ACA).  News and social media bombard us daily one way or the other in an attempt to proclaim or disclaim the merits of this new law.  I've become dull to this over time in part because it wears me out, but also because my opinion is by now well-formed and unlikely to be persuaded.  However, a first person account shared with me by someone I respect catches my attention, and I had one the other day that I’d like to share.

A prospective manufacturing client company executive met with me over lunch, and our conversation eventually turned to, among other things, the 2.3% medical device excise tax which the law assesses against the gross sales of applicable products.  This tax, which has been collected since the beginning of the 2013, distinguishes itself because it does not take profitability into account.  Manufacturers and importers pay the tax regardless of its impact on the taxpayer’s net income.

What impact does this have and how may my prospective customer react?  His business achieves a modest but not uncommon 5% net profit margin.  That means he ends up, after collecting all his revenue, paying all his employees and suppliers, and covering all his overhead, with 5 cents on the dollar.  So, a 2.3% excise tax reduces that 5 cent profit margin by half unless other adjustments are made.  As he shared with me yesterday, my prospect will search for other adjustments to be made.

First, he considers sending work to an outsourced manufacturing plant in the Dominican Republic.  By doing so, the $11 per hour average labor he pays in the United States can be reduced to that country's labor rate of 70 cents per hour.  Even with the additional costs of freight incurred to get the product back into Texas for distribution to U.S. customers, my prospect believes he will reduce his overall production costs by 40%.

In addition, my prospect is considering other strategies to maintain his company’s profitability.  These include emphasizing technology as a way to reduce labor costs as well as raising prices to customers.  Because my job is to help client companies do more work with less effort, I participated in the conversation around technology.  Our technology proposals will help close the gap, and we’ll do all we can to help.  Raising prices to customers carries the obvious risks of making it easier for those customers to shop around for a lower price.  With more consideration, my prospect may very well discover additional ways to maintain his profit margin.

Firsthand accounts impress me more than what I read in the paper or hear on the news.  I realize I may also soon hear firsthand accounts from those greatly benefiting from greater access to healthcare.  These views will impact how I exercise my right to be responsible for the direction in which our country’s politicians lead us.  Regardless of your opinion, please join me in our very next local opportunity to be responsible by participating in the Texas 2014 Primary Election on March 4th.

Vote Texas

Tags: Affordable Care Act