BTerrell Group Blog

Brian Terrell

Recent Posts

DZone: The Impact of Robotic Process Automation on the Automotive Industry

Posted by Brian Terrell on Fri, Mar 09, 2018

The automotive industry has known exponential growth ever since its beginnings in the late 19th century. While in 1895 there were only four cars officially registered in the US, nine years later, in 1904, there were 121 US firms assembling and producing around 22,000 automobiles — and that was just the start. Only a few years later, in 1908, Ford's Model T was the first automobile to be mass-produced on moving assembly lines with all parts completely interchangeable.

The advent of robotic process automation (RPA) was a key milestone for the development of the automotive industry. Automation refers to the use of machines to perform tasks that had previously been undertaken by humans, which reduces the error rate and enhances the management of repeatable tasks.

Read more.

Tags: RPA_All

Your Five-Step Program to Revenue Recognition Compliance

Posted by Brian Terrell on Fri, Mar 02, 2018

I’ve been writing a lot lately about the new revenue recognition standards (created by ASC 606 and IFRS 15) companies will soon need to adopt toGAAP_image.jpg ensure compliance. Granted, it’s a complex and somewhat dry topic, but it’s one poised to have a tremendous impact on public and private companies alike. Since most of us aren’t accountants (full disclosure – I am, but not practicing), I thought it could be helpful to boil down the changes to the five core steps to compliance.

Read more.

 

Tags: RPA_Lead_Story

Entrepreneur: Automation Is Expected to Create Jobs but Only You Can Make Sure You Get One

Posted by Brian Terrell on Fri, Mar 02, 2018

As workers, we have many job-related rights. What we don’t have is the right of continued employment. Whether that should change is another topic. But what we do have is the desire to better ourselves and be forward thinking.

It doesn’t take much forward thinking to realize that today’s jobs are becoming automated. Robots? Check. Artificial intelligence combined with Internet of Things devices? Check. They are coming and in ways we never thought possible 10 years ago. Who would have thought we’d be talking to chat boxes for customer service, for example?

Read more.

Tags: RPA_All

ITProPortal: How outsourcing companies are using Robotic Process Automation

Posted by Brian Terrell on Fri, Mar 02, 2018

Both large enterprises and small-scale companies have numerous rule-based tasks set for daily completion. Outsourcing is the most strategic solution for augmenting in-house staff as they shift focus to core objectives that result in high-quality products and a satisfactory user experience.   

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is moving to the forefront as an innovative solution for automating work processes without eliminating the value of human collaboration. People must train these machines for optimal performance. As the robotic systems learn the necessary tasks, they will work alongside humans as assistants.  

Read more.

Tags: RPA_All

Transitioning to ASC 606? Which is right for you - modified or full retrospective?

Posted by Brian Terrell on Fri, Feb 23, 2018

Companies have two options when implementing the new Revenue from Contracts with Customers standard, codified as ASC 606. You can takeFull_or_Modified.jpg a retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. Both approaches require significant effort to account for contracts under both the old and the new guidance before and during the transition year, and clients with whom we’ve spoken express concern that this parallel processing is the greatest single challenge currently offered by ASC 606. Let’s take a quick look at each approach, and offer a few reasons why a company might choose one over the other. 

Full Retrospective

Under the full retrospective approach, you will determine the cumulative effect of applying the new standard as of the beginning of the first historical period presented, and you will recast revenue and expenses for all prior periods presented in the year of adoption of the new standards. If you are considering this method, you have zero time to waste.

Highlights and lowlights:

  • Your stakeholders and/or shareholders may demand it
  • Useful trend information can be had across all the period presented on your financials
  • You must recast previous financial statements as if the new guidance had always existed for a comparative two-year period prior to the adoption year
  • It’s likely to require significant time and effort
  • If contract volume exceeds even a handful, then finance and accounting automation beyond that provided by Excel spreadsheets will be a necessity

Modified Retrospective

Under the modified retrospective approach, you will apply the new standards to all new contracts initiated on/after the effective date, and, for contracts which have remaining obligations as of the effective date, you will enter an adjustment to the opening balance of your retained earnings account. Under this method you would not restate comparative periods in your financial statements. If you are considering this method, you have very little time to waste.

Highlights and lowlights:

  • Reduced effort in restating prior year amounts
  • No recasting of past revenue can speed implementation
  • Potential for “lost revenue” if the new guidance recognizes less revenue than the previous method would have in a particular period
  • Requires you to keep two sets of accounting records in the year of adoption in order to comply with the requirement to disclose all line items in the financial statements as if they were prepared under today’s guidance
  • Here too, even a modest number of contracts will demand more accounting and finance automation than Excel spreadsheets can reasonably provide

Regardless of which approach you select, you must endure a period of parallel reporting, where your accounting records must be maintained under both the current and new revenue recognition rules. This is likely to create data, process and system challenges that you should be solving now with the help of specialists in accounting, finance and ERP automation.

Remind me of those dates again

Public companies must be compliant with the new standard for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (i.e., January 1, 2018 for calendar year-end companies). Nonpublic entities must be compliant for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 (January 1, 2019 for calendar year-end companies). 

Wondering what other companies are doing?

Various surveys have found a fairly even split between the two approaches, with public corporations tending to favor the full retrospective option and private enterprises favoring the modified option.

The takeaway? The best method for your company may be the method that most other companies in your industry are using. Ask your colleagues, visit trade shows, and consult with the pros before making your decision. But don’t delay.

By BTerrell Group, Texas- based Intacct Partner

Tags: RPA_Lead_Story